Spinner<p>Re: Nakamura and Kramnik.</p><p>Former chess world champion <a href="https://dice.camp/tags/Kramnik" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Kramnik</span></a> is implying that <a href="https://dice.camp/tags/Nakamura" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Nakamura</span></a> is cheating, because Nakamura had a stretch of games with 2% likelihood.</p><p><a href="https://dice.camp/tags/Hikaru" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Hikaru</span></a> plays often, and in 200 stretches, one is probably going to have a 2% likelihood. None of the players he faced during that stretch was even a GM. Hikaru isn't <a href="https://dice.camp/tags/Niemann" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Niemann</span></a>. Implications are accusations.</p><p>It reminds me of the Olympic tendency of scores from the Russian judges. Politics, without rigor.</p><p><a href="https://dice.camp/tags/chess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>chess</span></a></p>