I've been curious about something for a long time. When people in tech say "neurodivergence", do you think about experiences like PTSD, mood disorders, learning disabilities, and other less commonly mentioned categories that also fall under the big tent of neurodivergence (e.g., not always just specifically things that there is a lot of online popular content about, like ADHD)?
@grimalkina@mastodon.social I usually think about ADHD/Autism/Dyslexia/Learning disabilities and less about PTSD and mood disorders, since the latter are usually mentioned separately even though symptoms may have similarities?
Also, when I see "neurodivergence" nowadays it's kind of in a positive light like — hey this all sucks but it's also a superpower!
I see PTSD and mood disorders more as something that requires support and patience and, in popular media at least they're definitely not presented as superpowers.
@writeblankspace I think your description matches a lot of how I've seen people talk about this. Yet, experiences like PTSD occur in brains, and change how people experience their world, and at least back in the day we were talking about those things like trauma and brain injury as being central to the neurodiversity world, but it seems like tech has defaulted to a mode where these intersections are ignored. For example post traumatic growth is a positive thing that could be celebrated
@grimalkina @writeblankspace There's a lot of thought gone into the similarities between autism/ADHD and PTSD symptoms, with some folk openly stating that the reason is that living as a neurodivergent person in a neuronormative world causes PTSD.
I really wouldn't know.
What it does do is reflect the experience of living with ADHD and autism. And dyslexia, dyscalculia, etc to varying degrees. I can see the attractiveness of the statement.
The whole point of neurdiversity advocacy, though...
@grimalkina @writeblankspace ... is to demonstrate that these conditions (whatever you put under the umbrella) are part of the "normal" range of brain function variations, and creating a system that traumatizes people (with a subset of characteristics) is the thing that needs to go.
It should follow that putting yourself into a pathologizing box isn't really compatible with such advocacy. It is identity politics more than anything, which can help/hinder advocacy .
So...
@grimalkina @writeblankspace ... with that out of the way (is it?), I think that the nugget of truth in this narrowing of the definition may be like the chicken and egg problem: which came first, the brain shape, or the symptoms?
I can cautiously get behind a definition that, roughly speaking, states that if brain shape comes first, neurodivergence is an accurate term. And if symptoms (e.g. induced by trauma) comes first, you can find a term that suggests more of an illness.
But that's...
@jens @writeblankspace part of what complicates this for me is there is a lot of emerging evidence that just makes this not such a clean narrative. What if you are born with certain characteristics that mean you develop a certain condition where other people wouldn't? Why privilege the "born with it" narrative when a physical injury can destroy part of your brain, does it really matter if it happened in early development or in an accident?
@jens @writeblankspace I recognize that these are really overwhelming philosophical questions without a single answer. I think I find it frightening how essentialist and biologically reductive our society can be, and often feel like I want to push against this because at the same time our actual understanding of this biology AND psychology is still SO limited.
@grimalkina @writeblankspace Agree.
Here's another angle to it: autism seeks unequivocal answers.
Also, there are suggestions that autism and ADHD are different expressions of the same underlying causes.
Now reconsider why there's a label whose definition got narrowed to meaning (mostly) those two.
@jens @writeblankspace continuing the theme of the need for intersectionality I also find the discussion in tech to be very gendered (little consideration of neurodivergent experiences that fall outside an assumed white male default). Perhaps a very unsurprising observation but important to remember I find
@grimalkina @writeblankspace That's less my experience, also because LGBTQIA+ and AuDHD apparently have a lot of correlation, and I can see that. Especially here, of course, but fedi is a special place.
More broadly in tech, absolutely, yep.
@jens @grimalkina @writeblankspace My working hypothesis about this isn't that we're any more prone to being trans than any other demographic.
We're just more prone to the introspection and radical self-honesty it takes to recognise it and act on that recognition, and less prone to the social pressure to pretend it isn't there.