#marcorubio is CUBAN-American!
A son of #refugees
Folks being “disappeared” can seem familiar.
Is his family…proud?
How about his #florida community?
It’s a betrayal…on every level.
#maga demands your duty, honor & humanity…
#trump owns you body & soul…
Like a vampire.
If it can happen to legal status #students …
Next time it’s a citizen…& “Dear leader” angered…
A 
& your #legal #rights vanish.
Even Repub #SCOTUS “Sainted” Antonin Scalia is on record.
The clock is ticking…
Supreme Court Says “Yes” to Regulating Ghost Guns—Including 3D Printed Guns
https://3dprint.com/317130/supreme-court-says-yes-to-regulating-ghost-guns-including-3d-printed-guns/
Decision - Bondi v. VanDerStok https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/garland-v-vanderstok-2/
#3dprinting #guncontrol #ghostguns #uslaw #uspol #SCOTUS
Trump admin begs SCOTUS to kill teacher training grants while handing billionaires massive tax cuts. Robbing schools to fund the rich—pure GOP corruption. Trump’s America: billionaires feast, kids get scraps. #Hypocrisy Trump war on education continue #SCOTUS #Corruption www.cnn.com/2025/03/26/p...
Trump administration asks Supr...
#NY has a #ShieldLaw that is intended to protect #AbortionProviders who send medications to patients in other states.
New York is 1 of 8 states that have enacted “telemedicine abortion shield laws” after #SCOTUS overturned the national right to an #abortion in 2022. The laws prevent ofcls from extraditing abortion providers to other states or from responding to subpoenas & other #legal actions…
The action by the NY court is the first time that an abortion shield law has been used.
A #NY state court on Thurs blocked #Texas from filing a legal action against a NY #doctor for prescribing & sending #abortion pills to a TX woman.
The unprecedented move catapults the interstate abortion wars to a new level, setting the stage for a high-stakes legal battle between states that ban abortion & states that support #AbortionRights.
The dispute is widely expected to reach #SCOTUS, pitting TX, which has a near-total #AbortionBan, against NY.
#law
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/27/health/new-york-texas-abortion-shield-law.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=p&pvid=65E1BF1E-9FF5-4478-BBFD-6D99DC29614E
'How A Schoolboy's Punishment Benefited America'
The teacher who punished Thurgood Marshall at school had no idea how that punishment would one day change the social landscape of the United States
https://medium.com/@weareji/how-a-schoolboys-punishment-benefited-america-cc7720eebd9c?sk=2b9544ddeb907fcd296bc5253c55a959
#history #Constitution #segregation #ThurgoodMarshall #SCOTUS #race #law #schools #punishment #America
@Frau_Sofa Grober Fehler in deinem Toot. #Trump ist gerade dabei die USA in einen Führer-Staat umzubauen. Was dann auch umgangssprachlich als Faschismus bezeichnet werden kann.
Nur weil ein Gericht temporär was dagegen sagt, ist nicht gesagt, dass
- die Administration #trump sich daran hält,
- hat ja #trump bereits den Chef vom #SCOTUS angewiesen(!!!) die Bundesrichter zurückzupfeifen.
Also mit der Rechtsstaatlichkeit in den USA ist das momentan so eine Sache.
@tagesschau So hätte man in den USA verfahren müssen. Stattdessen kam Trump v. United States heraus.
"The Biden administration said in 2022 that the same rules governing fully assembled weapons must also apply to ghost-gun kits.
Manufacturers and owners sued, arguing that the kits do not meet the legal definition of a 'weapon.'
The Supreme Court, in a 7-2 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, rejected that argument and upheld the Biden administration's regulations.
Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented.
Between the lines: Gun regulations usually lose at the Supreme Court, but it's important to note that this case did not raise any Second Amendment questions.
It hinged instead on the interpretation of specific phrases, including 'weapon,' in federal law."
I found 16 laughs in #SCOTUS arguments for FCC v. Consumers' Research.
FCC v. Consumers' Research LOL on p. 165 line 11 https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2024/23-354_2co3.pdf#page=166 #SCOTUS
FCC v. Consumers' Research LOL on p. 135 line 20 https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2024/23-354_2co3.pdf#page=136 #SCOTUS
FCC v. Consumers' Research LOL on p. 135 line 17 https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2024/23-354_2co3.pdf#page=136 #SCOTUS
FCC v. Consumers' Research LOL on p. 131 line 5 https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2024/23-354_2co3.pdf#page=132 #SCOTUS
FCC v. Consumers' Research LOL on p. 130 line 8 https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2024/23-354_2co3.pdf#page=131 #SCOTUS
FCC v. Consumers' Research LOL on p. 105 line 18 https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2024/23-354_2co3.pdf#page=106 #SCOTUS
FCC v. Consumers' Research LOL on p. 105 line 5 https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2024/23-354_2co3.pdf#page=106 #SCOTUS
FCC v. Consumers' Research LOL on p. 97 line 13 https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2024/23-354_2co3.pdf#page=98 #SCOTUS
FCC v. Consumers' Research LOL on p. 90 line 8 https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2024/23-354_2co3.pdf#page=91 #SCOTUS
FCC v. Consumers' Research LOL on p. 84 line 22 https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2024/23-354_2co3.pdf#page=85 #SCOTUS
