Follow

So Gab has decided that their own code that they spent $5M of investor money developing is so unsalvageably bad that they're going to use Mastodon's code instead, with the added bonus of leeching off of our apps (with Gab apps being banned from app stores)

This is an early warning to fellow admins to be vigilant and domain-block them on sight, when/if they appear (unconfirmed whether they intend to federate), and to app devs to consider if blocking Gab's domains from their app is necessary.

One has to wonder if their investors feel ripped off about this... After all, there are more than 2,000 installations of Mastodon and the costs begin at $5/mo, not $5M

@Gargron that's going to make it fairly hard for them to 'gab' with each other on the online web!

@Gargron man imagine ur code base sucking so much mastodon is better than it

@Gargron wonder how feasible it is to have a LICENSE that explicitly forbids it for being used for hate

@Gargron @j @LuigiEsq Licenses with ethical/morality clauses are very hard to enforce, due in part to issues with legal definition and interpretation (esp. across jurisdictions). JSON license "do no evil" clause is the most prominent example, but there are others.

Licenses will not help resolve this problem, which must be solved by the mechanisms most Mastodon instances (and maston.social, joinmastodon.org, and Mastodon client apps) are now using... 1/2

@Gargron @j @LuigiEsq Moderation, instance blocks, ToS, and policies (Server Covenant etc.) are effective, and will need to be done anyway.

Enforcement of copyleft license terms (GPL, AGPL, CC BY-SA etc.) is already extremely hard and requires money and legal resources.

License proliferation (e.g. not choosing AGPL for Mastodon) only causes friction for FOSS collaboration. It hurts devs and makes a mess that is difficult to clean up... which will only harm the Fediverse and limit use. 2/2

@diggity @j @LuigiEsq I agree in the sense that if someone violates AGPLv3 there are multiple established institutions willing to defend it which a custom license does not benefit from

I think I've also mentioned elsewhere in the thread that re-licensing Mastodon is practically very hard due to no CLA and about 600 contributors

@Gargron @j @LuigiEsq Yep. I got to this thread late but we're all in agreement.

I just *really* would hate to see a new license for Mastodon, it has been very successful under AGPL and will continue to be.

Historically, Gab will be a blip on the Mastodon radar... they may not even make the codebase switch. The devs are obviously sloppy AF and now that client apps like Tusky, Sengi etc will block their instance (rickrolling too!), Masto won't solve the primary problem Gab thought it would.

@j @Gargron That would be a nonfree license. You can't restrict how people use your software or that would not be "open source" or free software. It would become proprietary software instead.

@j

Completely feasible, and easy. Just insert the (completely subjective) line...

But it wouldn't be a free license as per , the , or the :
opensource.org/licenses

@Gargron @OpenSource @chucknorrisfacts @starwall

.

@inditoot @Gargron I don't see anything wrong with what he says. If people don't want to federate with them, let them choose not to

@inditoot @marsxyz @Gargron
The same as it's admind and instance choice, it's also the app dev choice. They might or they might not. But seeing as the gab app was banned from the store, maybe they also don't want their app banned from the store. It's their choice.

@trickster @inditoot @marsxyz @Gargron
No they have to enforce muh rights to freezepeach hateful content to other servers 😭

A reason behind "freeze peach" as you put it, is to protect minority and controversial views from persecution. It is easily the same principle that protects any of your own fringe beliefs.

But roll your own, you're essentially monarch of your instance.

@licho that's true. I am the one responsible for my instance.

@inditoot @marsxyz @Gargron blocking is a feature of this website I enjoy using. For example, I’m going to block you :)

@inditoot @marsxyz @Gargron
I think he is talking about blocking the domains if play store/app store decide to get rid of gab

@BadAtNames @inditoot@inditoot.com @marsxyz @Gargron just for the context, inditoot is an Indian version of Gab, a right wing platform and already in blocklist of some instances. That is why they are worrying about this

@inditoot @marsxyz @Gargron

who gives a shit if Nazis have a platform? why the fuck is everybody suddenly from the NPEA* lately

* Nazi Platform Enforcement Agency

@inditoot @pinkprius @Gargron App stores will block you for gab's content, it is 100% fair to warn people of this. And I am an app developer, and I WILL be blocking gab, because I 100% do not want to support white supremacy and hatred.

And neither should you.

@inditoot @pinkprius Not making the effort to oppose hatred means supporting hatred.

@inditoot @pinkprius No. No, we absolutely can't. We can not put "politics" aside when that politics is causing innocent people to be murdered, and people's basic rights to be violated.

No. No, we can't put "politics" aside. Doing so means approving of that hatred and murder. And it makes you complicit.

So no. We can't.

@WAHa_06x36
Agreed. Democide was the number one killer of people last century. If you have statists on your instance, I'm banning.
@pinkprius @inditoot

@bigl0af @inditoot @WAHa_06x36 you have every right to ban whoever you like, that's the whole point

@WAHa_06x36 @inditoot @pinkprius I find it amazing that people use the fediverse in complete ignorance that mastodon was *set up precisely because twitter is a fucking paradox of tolerance' if I'm being generous - binfire*

@inditoot @WAHa_06x36 thanks for wanting to help but we are doing fine without you interfering.

@inditoot @WAHa_06x36 @pinkprius

> Can we put politics and software aside.

after the Nazis are deplatformed globally, sure! but they want to kill me, and you, so, um, no. sorry.

if you want to go talk to Nazis and try to fix them, feel free. seems like you're working on the wrong problem here!

marketplace of ideas as long as you want at some Nazis and let everybody know how it went 🤣

@inditoot @WAHa_06x36 @Gargron people are building these apps in their free time, and you are crying that they don't want gab people to use these good apps 😏😃😆

@WAHa_06x36
What's your app? I need to know which one to avoid on principle. Block my instance too please...I don't want it associated with your shitlord app
@Gargron @pinkprius @inditoot
@WAHa_06x36 @Gargron @pinkprius @inditoot Maybe you should block instances where people say bad things about white people as well then?
@WAHa_06x36 @Gargron @pinkprius @inditoot If you were a web browser developer would you blacklist sites you don't like in your app? Think about where this is leading.

@inditoot @Gargron

whereas forgetting the paradox of tolerance entirely is a sign of vast maturity and no doubt endless wisdom 🤣 please, tell us another one

@inditoot @Gargron

you do realize one of the biggest appeals of mastodon to a lot of people is the "no nazis" part right?

@inditoot this is a very mature decision. This is the kind of decision that matured through decades actually.

You are enabling fascist.
I hope you get defederated into oblivion.

@Gargron Mastodon and ActivityPub open them up to a bigger audience. So, I imagine they'd be happy. Regardless if other instances ban them or not, this is how FB, Twitter and Youtube are making money, supporting the controversy because it gets more clicks. Not everyone will ban them and waves of drama will ensue.

@sikkdays @Gargron They’re not coming for the audience. Gab already has one. They’re coming for the protocols and tools. Gab isn’t in this to be a Twitter clone for the rest of her life.

@Gargron only if your work is free :) but yeah, they wasted a lot of $$$

@lain It's true that my work isn't free, but Gab gets the results of my work for free, so their investors' money didn't go to the development of their platform (or did, but got wasted--bad either way)

@Gargron @lain i don’t see that bad, firstly our Toots will be available to all Gab users, About 850000 members so our instances can be a trojan horse inside gab. Also there’ll be a lot of publicity around mastodon, and probably a lot of media coverage about fediverse and mastodon creator that will condamn the use of its software, bla bla bla...
so a lot new instances will be created, some band but a lot good, and for sure fediverse will be a lot bigger

@filippodb @Gargron @lain I guess the concern will be the unsavory nature of much of Gab's content then being associated with Mastodon. I honestly tried to engage with folk on Gan once, sought to understand their beliefs & worries. The torrent of abuse I got followed me off Gab and onto twitter. It's a terrible community. I don't think they should be silenced (that's a whole different matter) but I get the concerns of reputational damage by association.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

Server run by the main developers of the project 🐘 It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!