mastodon.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
The original server operated by the Mastodon gGmbH non-profit

Administered by:

Server stats:

354K
active users

@DrALJONES @Miro_Collas

(1/n)

" is not completely in error if we consider more qualitative aspects of history & look to European fascism as a whole and not just the German National Socialists (who were peculiar in many ways)."

Agreed.

, on the other hand, stands for the *systematic* destruction of a people on an industrial level including its culture. Even, , as I, too, have started calling him, falls a bit short by this measure.

..

@DrALJONES @Miro_Collas

(3/3)

...place, from a valid historical point of view.

More importantly, it indirectly "normalizes" 's crimes against humanity *by diminishing them, relatively speaking.*

Even if the Government really did plan the mass flight of the and even their eventual resettlement in , it simply would still be (fortunately) way below the atrocities committed by the big slayers of the Modern Age.

//

@HistoPol @DrALJONES

Valid points - yet I do think there are some parallels, even if the overall comparison fails.

@Miro_Collas
Oh, I agree very much with that statement.

My gut feeling about , legally speaking, is "very uneasy."

However, only (?) countries following the UK tradition of case law rely so heavily on "pararallels" aka "precedence."
Other jurisdictions operate quite differently (the laws, supported by court decisions.)
Even extremely similar cases might be decided quite differently (e.g. tax law.)
To make inferences would be treading on thin ice.

@DrALJONES

@HistoPol @DrALJONES

OK except that thread wasn't about law and legal definitions. It was rather whether comparisons could be made - on any level.

HistoPol (#HP) 🏴 🇺🇸 🏴

@Miro_Collas
I was solely referring to this post of yours where you talk about numerous "scholars" and "genocide."
I had assumed you were talking about scholars of international (criminal) law, was I mistaken in that assumption?

@DrALJONES

@HistoPol @DrALJONES I did say that - but it was in a different and separate conversation. We have been chatting in two threads. :-)

@Miro_Collas
Ah, sorry, my app is not very good at threading.
I night move the post later on then.

@DrALJONES

@Miro_Collas @DrALJONES

Ok.

We know; others might enjoy reading the other thread, too.