So, #wikipedia is fun, but depending on the language you can see the bias or what some people try to impose or want to hide.
Today's example: Gamazada. During this Basque revolt in 1893, the Spanish civil guard killed 6 people.
The Basque Wikipedia (https://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamazada) mentions that 6 (Basque) people were killed and a number of other civilians were injuried.
Neither the Spanish (https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamazada) nor the English (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamazada) one say anything about the people killed.
@joxean there's aven an article about the day those 6 were killed:https://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagastaren_tiroen_gaua
@theklan That doesn't exist in Spanish xD
@joxean Quite famously, the Croatian Wikipedia was run by literal fascists for almost a decade. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiHDo5bqNXw
@joxean
Our experience is that #wikipedia is an indictment on the #legacyInternet. It permits abuse, with omission and lies (re #Australian politics).
We see Wikipedia (incl. #WikiMedia) as a #politicalWeapon, also by how they shifted goalposts to prevent a more socially acceptable FediverseIcon being made available (2021-present).
Wikipedia can be 'fun' as you express, but it ought never be used for anything but scant curiosity. It's ultimately a dangerously #authoritarian construct.