@Nonya_Bidniss
Good summary.
I wanted to add here some related thoughts, starting from a suggestion to be wary of the statement "Government needs to be run like a business." It should not. It's meant to sound unobjectionable, but is a radical shift away from anything familiar.
The Constitution is designed around the notion of decentralizing control. It's inefficient, as people often notice, but that's by design. Inefficiency is protection from tyrants. It makes things happen slowly, allowing time for deliberation. Every time you make something efficient, you enable change to happen faster than government can respond, as is happening now with DOGE.
Tyrants want central control. Be wary of the statement "The President is the CEO" that want you to think a President is a King, a central voice to tell us everything. That neglects the checks & balances of three co-equal branches of government, intended to distribute control, to have the various branches fighting with one another, to make sure there's lots of consensus before anything happens.
When a Congressperson salutes POTUS and says "yes, sir, you're in charge", they breach their oath of office. The whole point of distributed power is distributed thought, which isn't happening.
It's pointless AND dangerous, to have all the thought be centralized in one person and then to have everyone just say "yes" because then you just have a zillion photocopies of one person's thought. If that person is even thinking. Democracy at all levels intends many people thinking in different ways and making sure all paths of thought lead to a convergent place. That's how consensus is built.
But even beyond that, government differs from business in another very important way. Business is founded centrally on the notion of profit made by determining who NOT to serve. It's rarely profitable to serve everyone, so the assumption is that it's fine to leave some unserved. Maybe someone else will serve them. Maybe not.
Business figures out its profitable customer base and just focuses on them. That's NOT what democratic government promises. Democracy, even beyond all the voting stuff, is about believing each person matters just because they exist, that dignity arises not from wealth but from being alive, that we are all equals, that government must serve each of us in a way that does not prioritize rich over poor.
Money already speaks. It needs no representation in government. People sometimes say Big Business needs special attention in government. It does not. It's not going to be forgotten, no matter what government does, so stop feeling sorry for it. It's willing to be petulant but in spite of its many pity parties, it is not suffering.
Undo the Citizens United ruling. Businesses are not people. Profit-making entities don't need to be voting. Their stakeholders can already vote. Businesses need no freedom of speech, no megaphone.
Business isn't going to suddenly stop happening if we change laws in some way that is favorable to regular folk. If the people who are in business now don't like it, they can drop out. Others will happily take their place.
What needs representation in government are regular people. Government sets the rules that all businesses must follow.
Adam Smith, called the father of economics and/or capitalism, expressed concern about morality in business. He very clearly understood that the optimization engine that is the marketplace will not find morality on its own, that business will tend toward tyranny if not forced to do otherwise. He suggested that if you want morality in business, it must be encoded in law.
It's government's job to make good rules that hold tyranny at bay. Some people and businesses will tell you they'd profit better if there were no rules. In my view, where there are no rules, bullies rule. That's no world to be seeking.
Nor should government be privatized. An important thing that government offers is accountability and auditability by the public, and redress of injustice. Many pushes for privatization are attempts to get around such scrutiny and accountability.
Government must NOT be run like a business. Elimination of inefficiency is not necessarily a good thing. Privatization loses control of and accountability for things that affect citizens' lives. Such suggestions are active dangers to democracy to be discussed with great wariness.